Iain Biggs Contested terms – rethinking ‘landscape’ and ‘nature’
This text goes right to the
heart of my research and practice, I had no concept of place until I went to
the locations where Ivon Hitchen's made his paintings with the idea of
remaking paintings from the same location. As much as I found it interesting
to see what Hitchen's might have seen (the same could be said
of Reas work Constable Country) I had no connection or desire
to draw or paint what I saw, I was cerebrally pleased, but emotionally dormant.
I can only guess that it was because I had no sense of place this
wasn't my place, I find my place more interesting, my place not
be as aesthetic, but I feel connected and can interpret the landscape
differently (that's interesting, this could be expanded)
Mapping/locating oneself through social
media or through online profiles. Does my profile match the person I am? should I
live in this house? in this place? am I who people think I am? am I who I want
me to be? Does this existentialist thinking create more of a disconnect to the
land/landscape/location? Am I real? There is a theory called
Block Theory, best explained by Wikipedia (sorry) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growing_block_universe
but I will have a go at explaining, all time and space is present in one “block universe”
this contains everything that has happened and will happen and all the space in
which this happens. This overcomes some of the conceptual and theoretical
issues associated with the start and end of the universe. It also corresponds (possibly)
with the Buddhist view of existence...I need to read more about this.
Suggested Reading
Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception
Lippard’s The Lure of the Local
Senses of Place in a Multicentered Society
Rogoff’s Terra In firma: Geography’s Visual Culture
Casey’s Getting Back into Place:
Towards a Renewed Understanding of the Place World
Schama’s Landscape and Memory
However, if we see the representation of ‘landscape’
as the means by which artists engage with issues of place, with questions about
our location in the world – a location which is always, as Merleau-Ponty made
clear, originally grounded in our immediate bodily location -its contemporary
relevance is at once considerably clearer. Experiencing place, through walking, recording, drawing, painting, affects memory because of the physical senses which imprint on the brain/body.
In his book Situatedness,
or Why we Keep Saying Where We’re Coming From, David Simpson has
made clear the extent to which ‘being placed ‘has now become an all-consuming obsession 1‘. He
explores in great detail the currently ubiquitous concern with situating
ourselves, with mapping our personal ‘positions’ in terms of an ever-expanding
matrix of reference points; references which now include anything from our
place of birth, ethnicity, political loyalties, gender and spiritual
orientation to the minutia of our particular ‘life-style choices’ – our holiday
destinations, preferred sexual practices, diet regimes and, if we are
academics, the particular theoretical sub-sects with which we identify
ourselves within this or that ongoing discursive polemic. All of which, as he
makes clear, suggests a profound anxiety as to our sense of our place in the
world.
It is often this second, ‘overlooked’ sense of
landscape as “mere place”, along with all that is lost, repressed or
marginalized by that designation, that is of particular interest to
contemporary artists. Suites my current research for practice, the path I am making work about would probably be considered a "mere place" but for those who used it, it was an important route into a managed wilderness an escape from the village. Reading Cheriton Now and Then the field the path runs through Lyes Field, was used for many years as a recreational site, but now thoroughbred horses are kept there (they used to be kept in the fields above Lyes Field, my speculation is that the horses are there to deter people from going into the field)
Comments
Post a Comment